How is the visual system able to operate at widely varying levels of light intensity?
Sanjay Manohar, Cambridge 2001
Need
1. Dynamic range
2. Perceptual constancy (albedo not luminance)
3. Coding - bandwidth
4. Prevent retinal damage
Definitions: Luminance, Illuminance, Albedo
Mechanism
1. pupil
2. rod vs cone
rod sacrifice low spat res colourless low saturation slow adapting
for low thresh
3. Amplification cascade
automatic gain control?
4. field adaptation
increment threshold
Weber-Fechner as gain control => contrast
Eigengrau
5. bleaching adaptation
pigment is active
increased noise
decreased gain
small bleaching => large gain reduction
6. Photoreceptor adaptation / Amplification cascade
Ca dependent
inhibits GC
activates PDE
activates G prot
inhibits RK
7. Lateral inhibition
centre-surround ganglion cell (1-200Hz)
8. Summation & inhibition
9. Central adaptation
?Peripheral retina x
Rod vs cone
Rod | Cone | |
Spatial summation | Yes | allows more receptors to contribute |
Colour | Yes | |
Adaptation | Slow | Fast |
Temporal integration | long | short |
Saturation luminance | low (scotopic) | high (photopic) |
Threshold | low | high |
Density | spread out | high : cones => acuity |
Number | 12m | 8m |
Distribution | periph | foveal |
The eye contains two types of receptors with very different transducing properties. Rods, having low thresholds and being more sensitive to low light intensities, are specialised for dim lighting (scotopic vision). They are found in the periphery of the retina, undergo much spatial summation, and adapt only slowly. But there's a price to pay -- they are saturated at relatively low light levels (100cd/m2), and have low spatial resolution. At levels higher than this, the cones take over. These receptors are of three subtypes with different peak wavelengths, and are thus facilitate colour vision. They are less sensitive to light, and are found in high densities at the fovea -- making them able to discriminate much finer detail than the rods.
Stiles crawford effect